A few reasons why psychologlsts can adhere to Feldman and Levin's model
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- open peer-commentary
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 18 (4) , 746-747
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00040735
Abstract
We emphasize the relevance to cognitive psychology of Feldman and Levin's theoretical position. Traditional views of motor control have failed to clearly separate “production control” at the level of motor command, based on task-independent CV (control variables), from intentional “product control” based on task-dependent parameters. Because F&L's approach concentrates on the first process (trajectory formation), it can distinguish the product control stage.Keywords
This publication has 305 references indexed in Scilit:
- Opening the grey boxTrends in Neurosciences, 1991
- Load compensation in human goal-directed arm movementsBehavioural Brain Research, 1990
- Relationships between orientation, movement and posture in weightlessness: Preliminary ethological observationsActa Astronautica, 1990
- Postural control in weightlessness: a dual process underlying adaptation to an unusual environmentTrends in Neurosciences, 1988
- Vestibular-oculomotor interaction in cat eye-head movementsBrain Research, 1983
- Influence of ‘strategy’ on muscle activity during ballistic movementsBrain Research, 1981
- Force Wave Transmission Through the Human Locomotor SystemJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1981
- Deafferentation in monkeys: Pointing at a target without visual feedbackExperimental Neurology, 1975
- Propriospinal control of last order interneurones of spinal reflex pathways in the catBrain Research, 1973
- Das ReafferenzprinzipThe Science of Nature, 1950