Effects of parasitic mites and protozoa on the flower constancy and foraging rate of bumble bees
- 4 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
- Vol. 58 (4) , 383-389
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0945-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does the Flower Constancy of Bumble Bees Reflect Foraging Economics?Ethology, 2004
- Strong context‐dependent virulence in a host–parasite system: reconciling genetic evidence with theoryJournal of Animal Ecology, 2003
- Parasitic Mite Infestation in Introduced Colonies of European Bumblebees, Bombus terrestris.Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, 2000
- The effect of cowpox virus infection on fecundity in bank voles and wood miceProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1997
- Can Sublethal Parasitism Destabilize Predator-Prey Population Dynamics? A Model of Snowshoe Hares, Predators and ParasitesJournal of Animal Ecology, 1997
- Bumble bee learning and flower morphologyAnimal Behaviour, 1994
- Variation in Life-History Pattern in Relation to Worker Mortality in the Bumble-Bee, Bombus lucorumFunctional Ecology, 1992
- Endoparasitic larvae of conopid flies alter pollination behavior of bumblebeesThe Science of Nature, 1990
- THE EFFECTS OF FOOD SUPPLY ON ADULT SIZE IN THE BUMBLE BEE BOMBUS TERRICOLA KIRBY (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE)The Canadian Entomologist, 1988
- Behavior of Parasitized Aposematic Caterpillars: Advantageous to the Parasitoid or the Host?The American Naturalist, 1981