The Nearly Good, the Bad, and the Ugly in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health Care
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Economic Issues
- Vol. 30 (3) , 755-775
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1996.11505835
Abstract
(1996). The Nearly Good, the Bad, and the Ugly in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health Care. Journal of Economic Issues: Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 755-775.This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Staging for prostate cancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- The Use and Abuse of Practice ProfilesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Cost-effective preoperative laboratory testingPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Is the Oregon rationing plan fair?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Oregon's bold Medicaid initiativePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Challenges for Cost-effectiveness ResearchMedical Decision Making, 1986
- Use and Misuse of the Term “Cost Effective” in MedicineNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Hospital Cost ShiftingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Economic Assessments of Medical Practices and TechnologiesMedical Decision Making, 1981
- Foundations of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health and Medical PracticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977