Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and Mortality from Prostate Cancer
- 3 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 23 (3) , 248-253
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0479-7
Abstract
There is no available evidence from randomized trials that early detection of prostate cancer improves health outcomes, but the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test is commonly used to screen men for prostate cancer. The objective of the study is to see if screening with PSA decreases mortality from prostate cancer. This is a case-control study using one-to-one matching on race, age, and time of availability of exposure to PSA screening. Decedents, 380, from New Jersey Vital Statistics 1997 to 2000 inclusive, 55–79 years of age at diagnosis were matched to living controls without metastatic prostate cancer. Medical records were obtained from all providers, and we abstracted information about PSA tests from 1989 to the time of diagnosis in each index case. Measurements consist of a comparison of screening (yes, no) between cases and controls. Measure of association was the odds ratio. Eligible cases were diagnosed each year from 1989 to 1999 with the median year being 1993. PSA screening was evident in 23.2–29.2% of cases and 21.8–26.1% of controls depending on the screening criteria. The unadjusted, matched odds ratio for dying of prostate cancer if ever screened was 1.09 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.60) for the most restrictive criteria and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.66) for the least restrictive. Adjustment for comorbidity and education level made no significant differences in these values. There were no significant interactions by age or race. PSA screening using an ever/never tabulation for tests from 1989 until 2000 did not protect New Jersey men from prostate cancer mortality.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- SCREENING WITH PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER RISK: A POPULATION BASED CASE-CONTROL STUDYJournal of Urology, 2005
- COMPARISON OF SCREEN DETECTED AND CLINICALLY DIAGNOSED PROSTATE CANCER IN THE EUROPEAN RANDOMIZED STUDY OF SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER, SECTION ROTTERDAMJournal of Urology, 2005
- Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Prevalence of Prostate Cancer among Men with a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level ≤4.0 ng per MilliliterNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Prostatectomy with Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Large‐scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: Program performances in the European randomized screening for prostate cancer trial and the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovary cancer trialInternational Journal of Cancer, 2001
- A Case–Control Study of Screening Sigmoidoscopy and Mortality from Colorectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- The effectiveness of cervical screening: A population-based case-control studyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- DOES SCREENING BY "PAP" SMEARS HELP PREVENT CERVICAL CANCER?The Lancet, 1979
- Sampling Methods for Random Digit DialingJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1978