The optimum decision rules for the oddity task
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 58 (1) , 10-21
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03205470
Abstract
This paper presents the optimum decision rule for an m-interval oddity task in whichm-1 intervals contain the same signal and one is different or odd. The optimum decision rule depends on the degree of correlation among observations. The present approach unifies the different strategies that occur with “roved” or “fixed” experiments (Macmillan & Creelman, 1991, p. 147). It is shown that the commonly used decision rule for anm-interval oddity task corresponds to the special case of highly correlated observations. However, as is also true for thesame-different paradigm, there exists a different optimum decision rule when the observations are independent. The relation between the probability of a correct response andd’ is derived for the three-interval oddity task. Tables are presented of this relation for the three-, four-, and five-interval oddity task. Finally, an experimental method is proposed that allows one to determine the decision rule used by the observer in an oddity experiment.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The optimum decision rules in thesame-different paradigmPerception & Psychophysics, 1996
- A table ofd′ forM-alternative odd-man-out forced-choice proceduresPerception & Psychophysics, 1992
- Spectral weights in profile listeningThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990
- Analysis of weights in multiple observation tasksThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989
- Towards a model for discrimination of broadband signalsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1986
- Tables of d′ for the triangular method and the 3-AFC signal detection procedurePerception & Psychophysics, 1980
- The paradox of discriminatory nondiscriminators resolvedChemical Senses, 1979
- Variations of the triangular method and the relationship of its unidimensional probabilistic models to three‐alternative forced‐choice signal detection theory modelsBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1979
- A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choicePerception & Psychophysics, 1979
- Some Relationships among Sensory Difference TestsBiometrics, 1963