Once‐Daily Trandolapril Compared with the Twice‐Daily Formulation in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension: Assessment by Conventional and Ambulatory Blood Pressures
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 33 (9) , 832-836
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1993.tb01959.x
Abstract
A double‐blind, crossover study was carried out to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of the long‐acting ACE inhibitor trandolapril 1 mg administered once daily and 0.5 mg twice daily in 31 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After randomization, patients entered a single‐blind placebo period of 4 weeks. After a double‐blind treatment of 4 weeks with either of the dosage regimens, patients were then crossed over to the alternate regimen for the last 4 weeks of the study. Conventional BP and heart rate were measured on each visit and ambulatory BP monitoring was done at baseline and at the end of each treatment phase. Conventional as well as 24‐hour and awake ambulatory systolic and diastolic BPs were significantly (P < 0.001) and almost identically decreased by both once‐ and twice‐daily formulations. Moreover, the clinical response rates (reduction in seated diastolic BP ≥ 10% or diastolic BP ≤90 mm Hg) were similar with both treatment regimens (42% vs. 45% with the once‐ and twice‐daily formulations, respectively). However, trandolapril twice daily exerted a significantly (P = 0.03) greater antihypertensive effect on systolic BP during sleep as compared with the once‐daily formulation. Due to the fact that the minimal effective dose was used in this trial, further studies with higher doses should demonstrate effective 24‐hour control of BP as described with other long‐acting ACE inhibitors. In addition, our results suggest that ambulatory BP measurements should be done in dose‐response studies.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Once‐Daily Lisinopril Compared with Twice‐Daily Captopril in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hypertension: Assessment of Office and Ambulatory Blood PressuresThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1990
- The Emerging Role of ACE Inhibitors in the Treatment of Cardiovascular DiseaseJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1990
- Lisinopril dose‐response relationship in essential hypertension.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1989
- Comparison of Antihypertensive Therapies by Noninvasive TechniquesChest, 1989
- Definition of the effective dose of the converting-enzyme inhibitor benazeprilAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1988
- The 1988 Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood PressureArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1988
- Differential effects of oral trandolapril and enalapril on rat tissue angiotensin-converting enzymeEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1988
- What is the role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertensive patients?Hypertension, 1985
- The two‐period cross‐over clinical trial.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1979