How have M&As changed? Evidence from the sixth merger wave
- 1 September 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The European Journal of Finance
- Vol. 18 (8) , 663-688
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847x.2011.628401
Abstract
We examine the characteristics of the sixth merger wave that started in 2003 and came to an end approximately in late 2007. The drivers of this wave lie primarily in the availability of abundant liquidity, in line with neoclassical explanations of merger waves. Acquirers were less overvalued relative to targets, and merger proposals comprised higher cash elements. Moreover, the market for corporate control was less competitive, acquirers were less acquisitive, managers displayed less over-optimism and offers involved significantly lower premiums, indicating more cautious and rational acquisition decisions. Strikingly, however, deals destroyed at least as much value for acquiring shareholders as in the 1990s.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gains from Mergers and Acquisitions Around the World: New EvidenceFinancial Management, 2010
- Do Envious CEOs Cause Merger Waves?The Review of Financial Studies, 2009
- Merger Momentum and Investor Sentiment: The Stock Market Reaction to Merger Announcements*The Journal of Business, 2006
- Corporate Cash Reserves and AcquisitionsThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- Competing Bids, Target Management Resistance, and the Structure of Takeover BidsThe Review of Financial Studies, 1993
- Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- Takeovers in the '60s and the '80s: Evidence and implicationsStrategic Management Journal, 1991
- The rise in takeover premiums: An exploratory studyJournal of Financial Economics, 1989
- A Theory of Preemptive Takeover BiddingThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1988
- Takeovers, Shareholder Returns, and the Theory of the FirmThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1980