Modulation and gap detection for broadband and filtered noise signals
- 1 August 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 84 (2) , 545-550
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396831
Abstract
Modulation detection threshold (as a function of sinusoidal amplitude modulation frequency) and temporal gap detection thresholds were measured for three low-pass-filtered noise signals (fc = 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz), a high-pass-filtered noise signal (fc = 4000 Hz), and a broadband signal. The two latter noise signals were effectively low-pass filtered (fc = 6500 Hz) by the earphone. Each of the filtered signals was presented with a complementary filtered noise masker. Modulation and gap detection thresholds were lowest for the broadband and high-pass signals. Thresholds were significantly higher for the low-pass signals than for the broadband and high-pass signals. For these tasks and conditions, the high-frequency content of the noise signal was more important than was the signal bandwidth. Senstivity (s) and time constant (.tau.) indices were derived from functions fitted to the modulation detection data. These indices were compared with gap detection thresholds for corresponding signals. The gap detection thresholds were correlated inversely (p = - 1.0, p < 0.05) with s (i.e., smaller gap detection thresholds were correlated with greater sensitivity to modulation), but were not correlated significantly with .tau., which was relatively invariant across signal conditions.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Temporal Factors in PsychoacousticsPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- Amplitude modulation thresholds in chinchillas with high-frequency hearing lossThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1984