Can the electroweak vacuum be unstable?
- 15 July 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 40 (2) , 613-619
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.40.613
Abstract
The electroweak vacuum need not be absolutely stable. For certain top-quark and Higgs-boson masses in the minimal standard model, our vacuum is instead metastable with a lifetime exceeding the present age of the Universe. It has been suggested that a metastable vacuum is generally ruled out because high-energy cosmic-ray collisions would have long ago induced its decay. I argue that the reasoning for this conclusion is erroneous. As a consequence, upper bounds on the top-quark mass derived from stability arguments are relaxed. Also presented is an analytic method for accurately approximating the lifetime of the vacuum from the effective potential without solving for the 0(4) bounce solution numerically.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cosmic-ray induced vacuum decay in the standard modelPhysics Letters B, 1988
- Tunneling without barriersNuclear Physics B, 1986
- Theoretical ceiling on quark masses in the standard modelPhysics Letters B, 1985
- Upper limits to fermion masses in the Glashow-Weinberg-Salam modelPhysical Review D, 1983
- Cosmological Lower Bound on the Higgs-Boson MassPhysical Review Letters, 1980
- Bounds on the fermions and Higgs boson masses in grand unified theoriesNuclear Physics B, 1979
- Vacuum Instability and New Constraints on Fermion MassesPhysical Review Letters, 1979
- Bounds on particle masses in the Weinberg-Salam modelPhysics Letters B, 1979
- On the vacuum instability and the Higgs meson massPhysics Letters B, 1977
- Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry BreakingPhysical Review D, 1973