Study Techniques and Cognitive Style: Their Effect on Recall and Recognition
- 1 January 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Educational Research
- Vol. 71 (3) , 175-178
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1978.10885064
Abstract
Field-independent and field-dependent college students studied a 1525-word article under a preferred or non preferred study condition (read only, underline, or note taking). Half of the subjects reviewed the material prior to an examination and half did not. Results indicated that both field-independent and field-dependent subjects generally produced the best recognition scores when they used a non preferred study technique and reviewed. Both note takers and underliners produced significantly better recall scores than readers only. Implications for further research are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational ImplicationsReview of Educational Research, 1977
- The Effect of Encoding and an External Memory Device on Note TakingThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1975
- Generative underlining strategies in prose recall.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975
- Effectiveness of highlighting for retention of text material.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974
- Effects of encoding cues on prose learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972
- Underlining versus Repetitive ReadingThe Journal of Educational Research, 1972
- Effectiveness of Different Methods of StudyThe Journal of Educational Research, 1962
- The Effect of Study Techniques on Comprehension and RetentionThe Journal of Educational Research, 1956
- The comparative effectiveness of certain study techniques in the field of history.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1942