Medical malpractice and the thyroid gland
- 29 May 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Head & Neck
- Vol. 25 (6) , 429-431
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.10254
Abstract
Background. A medical malpractice litigation “crisis” exists in this country. Analyzing litigation trends through verdict summaries may help understand causes. Methods. Jury verdict reviews from 1987–2000 were obtained from a computerized database. Reviews compile data on defendants, plaintiffs, allegations of wrongdoing, and verdict summaries. Results. Thirty suits from nine states occurred. Plaintiffs were women in 80% of the cases, with a median age of 41. Fifty percent of patients (15 of 30) had a bad outcome, (9 of 30 dead, 4 of 30 with neurologic deficits, 1 blind, and 1 alive with cancer). Thirty percent alleged surgical complications, mostly recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, and 75% of cancer patients alleged a delay, either through falsely negative biopsies or no biopsy taken. Respiratory events occurred in 43% and frequently resulted in large awards. Conclusions. The liberal use of fine-needle aspiration and documentation of surgical risks may help reduce litigation. Complications and bad outcomes do not indicate negligence. Analysis may contribute to risk management strategies or litigation reform. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 25: 429–431, 2003Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer of the Oral Cavity and Medical MalpracticeThe Laryngoscope, 2002
- Medical Malpractice and Cancer of the LarynxThe Laryngoscope, 2002
- Preventing the Delayed Diagnosis of Breast Cancer through Medical Litigation AnalysisSurgical Oncology Clinics of North America, 1994
- Informed consent: using a structured interview changes patients' attitudes towards informed consentThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1993
- Medical malpractice involving colon and rectal diseaseDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1993
- Causes of Breast Cancer Malpractice LitigationArchives of Surgery, 1992