A Comparison of the WAIS-R and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability with Learning-Disabled College Students
- 1 September 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
- Vol. 3 (3) , 267-274
- https://doi.org/10.1177/073428298500300307
Abstract
The present study compares the performance of learning-disabled college students on the WAIS-R and the Tests of Cognitive Abilities from the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. It was found that there was no significant difference between the performance of learning-disabled college students on both instruments. Results of this study are different from those of similar studies comparing the WISC-R and the Tests of Cognitive Abilities.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Response to Some Questions Raised About the Woodcock-Johnson I. the Mean Score Discrepancy IssueSchool Psychology Review, 1984
- Research on the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery: Implications for Practice and Future InvestigationsSchool Psychology Review, 1984
- Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised: An Appraisal and ReviewSchool Psychology Review, 1984
- Cummings and Moscato Soft on Woodcock—JohnsonSchool Psychology Review, 1984
- Concurrent validity of the Woodcock-Johnson tests of cognitive ability with the WISC-R: EMR childrenPsychology in the Schools, 1983
- A New Definition of Learning DisabilitiesLearning Disability Quarterly, 1981
- A comparison of the WISC-R and the Woodcock-Johnson tests of cognitive abilityPsychology in the Schools, 1981
- The Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability: Concurrent Validity with the WISC-RLearning Disability Quarterly, 1979