The Comparative Effects of Postoperative Analgesic Therapies on Pulmonary Outcome
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 86 (3) , 598-612
- https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199803000-00032
Abstract
Intercostal nerve block, wound infiltration with local anesthetic, and intrapleural local anesthetic. Measures of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), vital capacity (VC), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), PaO2, and incidence of atelectasis, pulmonary infection, and pulmonary complications overall were analyzed. Compared with systemic opioids, epidural opioids decreased the incidence of atelectasis (risk ratio [RR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.85) and had a weak tendency to reduce the incidence of pulmonary infections (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.18-1.53) and pulmonary complications overall (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.20-1.33). Epidural local anesthetics increased PaO2 (difference 4.56 mm Hg, 95% CI 0.058-9.075) and decreased the incidence of pulmonary infections (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21-0.65) and pulmonary complications overall (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.80) compared with systemic opioids. Intercostal nerve blockade tends to improve pulmonary outcome measures (incidence of atelectasis: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27-1.57, incidence of pulmonary complications overall: RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.18-1.22), but these differences did not achieve statistical significance. There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in the surrogate measures of pulmonary function (FEV1, FVC, and PEFR). These analyses support the utility of epidural analgesia for reducing postoperative pulmonary morbidity but do not support the use of surrogate measures of pulmonary outcome as predictors or determinants of pulmonary morbidity in postoperative patients. Implications: When individual trials are unable to produce significant results, it is often because of insufficient patient numbers. It may be impossible for a single institution to study enough patients. Meta-analysis is a useful tool for combining the data from multiple trials to increase the patient numbers. These meta-analyses confirm that postoperative epidural pain control can significantly decrease the incidence of pulmonary morbidity. (Anesth Analg 1998;86:598-612)...Keywords
This publication has 89 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-analysis in pain relief: a valuable but easily misused toolCurrent Opinion In Anesthesiology, 1996
- Effects of regional anesthesia on perioperative outcomeJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1996
- A Comparison of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia with Sufentanil by the Lumbar Versus Thoracic Route After ThoracotomyAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1994
- Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Epidural Analgesia Using Bupivacaine and Opioids Versus Parenteral OpioidsAnesthesiology, 1993
- Continuous intercostal nerve block versus epidural morphine for postthoracotomy analgesiaThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1993
- Efficacy of continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block on post-thoracotomy pain and pulmonary mechanicsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1990
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985
- Effect of Prophylactic Epidural Morphine or Bupivacaine on Postoperative Pain after Upper Abdominal SurgeryActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1982
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981