Multiple Methods for Platelet Enumeration: Observation of a Newly Introduced Bias
Open Access
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 87 (1) , 109-112
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/87.1.109
Abstract
After the introduction of Coulter S-Cal™, a bias became apparent between platelet counts obtained from instruments calibrated with this material and those obtained from a Clay Adams Ultra-Flo®. Statistical methods were used to compare platelet counts obtained from the Coulter S-Plus IV®, Ortho ELT-800®, Clay Adams Ultra-Flo 100®, and phase microscopy. At a P value of 0.01, paired t analysis revealed statistically significant biases between the Ultra-Flo and each of the other methods. Significant biases were also found between phase microscopy and each of the other methods, although these were of a smaller magnitude. The results indicate the necessity for users of multiple platelet counting methods to conduct comprehensive interinstrument evaluations, particularly when altering methods of calibration.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Calibration Bias and Imprecision for Automated Hematology Analyzers: An Evaluation of Significance of Short-Term Bias Resulting from Calibration of an Analyzer with S Cal™American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1985
- A REVIEW OF PLATELET COUNTING PERFORMANCE IN THE UNITED-STATES1980
- Evaluation of Biologic Sources of Variation of Leukocyte Counts and Other Hematologic Quantities Using Very Precise Automated AnalyzersAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1978
- CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PLATELET COUNTING METHODS1977