Jurors' use of probabilistic evidence.
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 20 (1) , 49-82
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01499132
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgmentPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Can Jurors Understand Probabilistic Evidence?Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1991
- Judgements of Murder Mysteries as a Means of Studying Juror CognitionBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 1989
- Bayes' theorem in the trial process: Instructing jurors on the value of statistical evidence.Law and Human Behavior, 1988
- Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof.Law and Human Behavior, 1985
- In search of reasonable doubt: A systematic examination of selected quantification approaches.Law and Human Behavior, 1985
- Bayesian inference: Combining base rates with opinions of sources who vary in credibility.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- Human Information Processing and Adjudication: Trial by HeuristicsLaw & Society Review, 1981
- Decision Theory and the Factfinding ProcessStanford Law Review, 1968