Lack of specificity of cell‐surface protease targeting of a cytotoxic hyperfusogenic gibbon ape leukaemia virus envelope glycoprotein
- 20 June 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Gene Medicine
- Vol. 4 (6) , 592-600
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jgm.306
Abstract
Background In a strategy termed “Protease Targeting”, retroviral vectors carrying an EGF infectivity‐blocking domain fused to the N‐terminus of the envelope SU via a MMP (matrix metalloproteinase)‐cleavable linker were successfully used to target gene delivery to EGF receptor‐(EGF‐R‐)positive tumour cells over‐expressing MMPs. In the current study, we aimed to investigate whether this strategy could be applied to (a) limit the cytotoxic activity of a hyperfusogenic GALV therapeutic gene, and (b) enhance the immune‐stimulatory properties of GALV via local, MMP‐mediated release human granulocyte‐macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM‐CSF). Methods We generated GALV envelope expression constructs displaying EGF or GM‐CSF blocking ligands at the N‐terminus of GALV envelope SU via a non‐cleavable, Factor Xa protease or MMP‐cleavable linker and investigated their cytotoxicity on MMP‐positive and negative cell lines. Results The unmodified hyperfusogenic GALV envelope was cytotoxic to all cell lines tested. The non‐cleavable linker GALV envelope constructs caused no cytotoxicity, demonstrating efficient inhibition by the displayed domains. Moderate activation of fusion of the protease‐cleavable linker constructs was observed in all cell lines, regardless of their level of MMP expression and of the specificity of the linker. High levels of the ‘blocking domain’ were detected in the cell supernatants due to dissociation of the surface unit (SU) from the transmembrane (TM) component of the GALV envelope glycoprotein TM. Conclusions Unlike protease targeting in the context of retroviral vectors, protease activation of the cytotoxicity of GALV envelope by cleavage of a fusion blocking ligand at the cell surface does not appear to be specifically mediated by cell‐surface MMPs. In addition, shedding of the SU‐fusion protein from the TM limits the general applicability of this strategy for cancer gene therapy. Specificity of cell‐cell fusion mediated by GALV envelope cannot be manipulated in the same fashion as virus‐cell fusion. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A transcriptional feedback loop for tissue-specific expression of highly cytotoxic genes which incorporates an immunostimulatory componentGene Therapy, 2001
- A lentiviral vector expressing a fusogenic glycoprotein for cancer gene therapyGene Therapy, 2000
- A Hyperfusogenic Gibbon Ape Leukemia Envelope Glycoprotein: Targeting of a Cytotoxic Gene by Ligand DisplayHuman Gene Therapy, 2000
- Selective transduction of protease-rich tumors by matrix-metalloproteinase-targeted retroviral vectorsGene Therapy, 1999
- Matrix MetalloproteinasesJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1999
- Inverse Targeting of Retroviral Vectors: Selective Gene Transfer in a Mixed Population of Hematopoietic and Nonhematopoietic CellsBlood, 1998
- Masking of Retroviral Envelope Functions by Oligomerizing Polypeptide AdaptorsVirology, 1997
- A Gene Delivery System Activatable by Disease-Associated Matrix MetalloproteinasesHuman Gene Therapy, 1997
- Regulating gene expression in gene therapyTrends in Biotechnology, 1993
- Vaccination with irradiated tumor cells engineered to secrete murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates potent, specific, and long-lasting anti-tumor immunity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1993