Prenatal Ultrasound Screening and Perinatal Outcome
- 24 February 1994
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 330 (8) , 570-572
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199402243300812
Abstract
Ewigman et al. (Sept. 16 issue)1 attempted to determine the efficacy of ultrasonography in pregnancy, but their methods obscured the issue of routine scanning. Of 55,744 women registering for obstetrical care, the authors excluded 32,317 (58 percent). Another 7897 (14 percent) were lost to follow-up or declined to participate in the study. Thus, of all the women, only 15,530 (28 percent) were actually studied. Of the half assigned to the control group (14 percent of the initial cohort), 45 percent underwent ultrasonography.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Prenatal Ultrasound Screening on Perinatal OutcomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: Impact on maternal management and outcomeAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993
- Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome with Use of Maternal Serum MarkersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Sensitivity of routine ultrasonographic screening for congenital anomalies during the last 5 yearsJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 1992
- Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome: the effect of routine ultrasound scan determination of gestational age and adjustment for maternal weightBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992