Improving Return Rates for Health-Care Outcome
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 87 (2) , 639-642
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2000.87.2.639
Abstract
The objective was to test two methods of reducing loss of data in follow-up by abbreviating the questionnaire and offering a token monetary incentive. Primary data were collected between September 14, 1998 and July 23, 1999 from an adult psychiatric population, representing about 50% of all patients, all of whom agreed to participate in a quality-assurance monitoring program. Briefer components of the SF-36 Health Status Survey were expected to yield higher return rates than would the SF-36 plus a form assessing amount of treatment received. Small monetary incentives were expected to result in higher return rates also. Patients were randomly assigned to the groups ( n = 73 each). Abbreviation of the questionnaire and use of a monetary incentive each reduced attrition by 10%. A diminishing returns effect for both methods was observed. Further study of a possible interaction between the questionnaire's length and monetary incentive is recommended.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increasing Return Rates of a Mail Survey to Exercise Professionals Using a Modest Monetary IncentivePerceptual and Motor Skills, 1998
- Maximizing Response to Surveys in Health Program Evaluation At Minimum Cost Using Multiple MethodsEvaluation Review, 1995
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, and Reliability Across Diverse Patient GroupsMedical Care, 1994
- The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1993
- Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-AnalysisPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1993
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- Performance of a Five-Item Mental Health Screening TestMedical Care, 1991
- Understanding Mail Survey Response Behavior: A Meta-AnalysisPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1991