Evaluating the Use of Technology in Reporting SCII Results to Students
- 1 October 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance
- Vol. 12 (3) , 166-173
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00256307.1979.12022198
Abstract
Because accurate reporting of test results is essential to the counseling process, it is important that information on test results be understandable, precise, and meaningful. This study compared the effectiveness of four methods of test reporting (slide/sound-only, counselor-only, combination of the two, and control) of the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory. Results revealed all groups receiving tests that report methods were more accurate in recall of test information and had higher student satisfaction than the control group. The results supported the use of an audiovisual device as an effective approach for disseminating and reporting test information.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating Career Counseling Outcome for Three Modes of Test InterpretationMeasurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1977
- Technology and CounselingThe Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1977
- Comparing Three Methods of Presenting Occupational InformationVocational Guidance Quarterly, 1975
- Computer-Based Report for the Strong Vocational Interest Blank for WomenMeasurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1971
- Comparing feedback methods after testing.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1969
- Relative effectiveness of two methods of interpreting ability test scores.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1969
- A comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of three methods of test interpretation.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1966
- The presentation of test information to college freshman.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1964
- A comparison of individual and multiple counseling for test interpretation interviews.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1963
- Pre‐testing Saves Training Costs*Personnel Psychology, 1952