Analysis and correction of gradient nonlinearity and B0 inhomogeneity related scaling errors in two‐dimensional phase contrast flow measurements
Open Access
- 22 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Vol. 53 (1) , 126-133
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20309
Abstract
Phase contrast flow measurements will be increasingly biased at eccentric positions, where nonlinearity of gradients and inhomogeneity of the main field become important. In theory, they scale the result of phase contrast flow values in two ways: incorrect velocity encoding of moving spins and geometric distortion of the vessel cross‐sectional area. A flow phantom, consisting of a 3D grid of interconnected tubes, was used to determine the spatial dependence of the associated scaling factors, which demonstrate that scaling errors in flow can be as large as 20% within the examined volume of 336 × 336 × 336 mm3. The same phantom was also used to determine and minimize concomitant gradient effects. Correction of the off‐center flow values with the local scaling factors and the concomitant gradient phase improves the measurement accuracy substantially, both in the flow phantom and in a volunteer study. Magn Reson Med 53:126–133, 2005.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Generalized reconstruction of phase contrast MRI: Analysis and correction of the effect of gradient field distortionsMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2003
- How to identify the haemodialysis access at risk of thrombosis? Are flow measurements the answer?Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 1999
- Hemodialysis Access Flow PhantomJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 1998
- Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient‐echo imagingJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1997
- Artifacts and signal loss due to flow in the presence of Bo inhomogeneityMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996
- Accuracy and precision of time-averaged flow as measured by nontriggered 2D phase-contrast MR angiography, a phantom evaluationMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1995
- Analysis of systematic and random error in MR volumetric flow measurementsMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1993
- Accuracy of phase‐contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial‐volume effectsJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1993
- Analysis of machine-dependent and object-induced geometric distortion in 2DFT MR imagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1992
- Factors influencing the accuracy and precision of velocity‐encoded phase imagingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1992