International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and New Zealand Physical Activity Questionnaire (NZPAQ): A doubly labelled water validation
Open Access
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Vol. 4 (1) , 62
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-4-62
Abstract
Accurate measurement of physical activity is a pre-requisite for monitoring population health and for evaluating effective interventions. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) is used as a comparable and standardised self-report measure of habitual physical activity of populations from different countries and socio-cultural contexts. The IPAQ has been modified to produce a New Zealand physical activity questionnaire (NZPAQ). The aim of this study was to validate the IPAQ and NZPAQ against doubly labelled water (DLW). Method: Total energy expenditure (TEE) was measured over a 15-day period using DLW. Activity-related energy expenditure (AEE) was estimated by subtracting the energy expenditure from resting metabolic rate and thermic effect of feeding from TEE. The IPAQ (long form) and NZPAQ (short form) were completed at the end of each 7-day period. Activity-related energy expenditure (IPAQAEE and NZPAQAEE) was calculated from each questionnaire and compared to DLWAEE. Thirty six adults aged 18 to 56 years (56% female) completed all measurements. Compared to DLWAEE, IPAQAEE and NZPAQAEE on average underestimated energy expenditure by 27% and 59%, respectively. There was good agreement between DLWAEE and both IPAQAEE and NZPAQAEE at lower levels of physical activity. However there was marked underestimation of questionnaire-derived energy expenditure at higher levels of activity. Both the IPAQ and NZPAQ instruments have a demonstrated systematic bias toward underestimation of physical activity-related energy expenditure at higher levels of physical activity compared to DLW. Appropriate calibration factors could be used to correct for measurement error in physical activity questionnaires and hence improve estimation of AEE.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Convergent validity of six methods to assess physical activity in daily lifeJournal of Applied Physiology, 2006
- Test-retest reliability of four physical activity measures used in population surveysJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2004
- Validation of the MetaMax II Portable Metabolic Measurement SystemInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004
- International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Reliability and ValidityMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2003
- Estimating Human Energy ExpenditureSports Medicine, 2003
- Attrition in longitudinal studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2002
- Body size and composition in PolynesiansInternational Journal of Obesity, 1999
- Physical activity assessment: A review of methodsCritical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 1996
- Compendium of Physical Activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activitiesMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1993
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986