Comparison of the Diagnostic Methods Used in Maxillofacial Trauma
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 75 (1) , 32-38
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198501000-00007
Abstract
A prospective study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic methods used in acute maxillofacial trauma. Clinical examination, routine facial X-rays with linear tomography, and computer tomography were compared in 49 patients. Computer tomography was found to be the most accurate test in the diagnosis of facial bone injury, especially complex fractures. Computer tomography also provided valuable information regarding soft-tissue injury of the face. The radiation doses of linear tomography and computer tomography were calculated to be below the level known to cause cataract formation. Computer tomography is a safe, reliable adjunct in the diagnosis of acute maxillofacial trauma and should be strongly considered after initial screening measures are completed.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- High-resolution CT analysis of facial struts in trauma: 2. Osseous and soft-tissue complicationsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1983
- High-resolution CT analysis of facial struts in trauma: 1. Normal anatomyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1983
- Computed tomography in facial trauma.Radiology, 1982
- High resolution CT with image reformation in maxillofacial pathologyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1982
- Value and limits of computer‐assisted tomographyHead & Neck Surgery, 1980
- Orbital Fracture Evaluation by Coronal Computed TomographyAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1978
- INTERNAL ORBITAL FRACTURES: THE VALUE OF LAMINAGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSISAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1966