Reply to ‘‘Comments on ‘Electronic structure of hydrogentated and unhydrogentated amorphous(0≤x≤1.6): A photoemission study’ ’’
- 15 February 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review B
- Vol. 33 (4) , 2847
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.33.2847
Abstract
We show that the interpretation of the topmost peak in the valence-band spectra of silicon nitride as due to lone-pair electrons is correct. In a Comment, Sacher and McIntyre object to our interpretation of the topmost peak in the photoemission spectra of a- as due to N 2p lone-pair electrons. They also suggest that the Si 2p line was improperly deconvoluted by us. We answer their criticism in turn.
Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comments on ‘‘Electronic structure of hydrogenated and unhydrogenated amorphousSiNx(0≤x≤1.6): A photoemission study’’Physical Review B, 1986
- Electronic structure of hydrogenated and unhydrogenated amorphous: A photoemission studyPhysical Review B, 1984
- Static Charge Fluctuations in Amorphous SiliconPhysical Review Letters, 1982
- Bond angles in disiloxane: A pseudo-potential electronic structure studyChemical Physics Letters, 1981
- On Si—O—Si configurations in silicatesActa Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials, 1978
- Electron states in-quartz: A self-consistent pseudopotential calculationPhysical Review B, 1977
- Electronic structure of Si, , and Ge from photoemission spectroscopyPhysical Review B, 1977
- The structural nature of amorphous Se and TeSolid State Communications, 1974