The Design of Evaluations for Continuous Quality Improvement
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation & the Health Professions
- Vol. 20 (3) , 265-285
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016327879702000302
Abstract
Many health care organizations are modeling continuous quality improvement activities after designs used in business and industry. This has resulted in a somewhat standardized and possibly limited approach to conducting quality improvement activities. In contrast, the evaluation paradigm provides a broader approach because the design of an evaluation may be based on the questions to be examined, or the design may emerge during the process of conducting the evaluation. This article examines the design of evaluations usedforcontinuous quality improvement activities in health care and human service organizations. Through a case example, the benefits of using alternative evaluation designs are explored. In particular; use of alternative approaches to gather and evaluate information about restrictive treatment interventions in a mental health setting are presented.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Outcomes in Psychiatry: An Inpatient ModelThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 1996
- 100 Methods for Total Quality ManagementPublished by SAGE Publications ,1996
- Implications of continuous quality improvement for program evaluation and evaluatorsEvaluation Practice, 1995
- Statistical process control in the practice of program evaluationEvaluation Practice, 1995
- Outcomes Management and Continuous Quality Improvement: The Compass and the RudderQRB - Quality Review Bulletin, 1993
- Total Quality Management in Human Service OrganizationsPublished by SAGE Publications ,1993
- Lessons From Industry: Revising Organizational Structure to Improve Health Care Quality AssuranceQRB - Quality Review Bulletin, 1991
- Internal EvaluationPublished by SAGE Publications ,1991
- Continuous Improvement as an Ideal in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Quality Assurance and Program EvaluationEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1983