ATTRIBUTION OF BLAME IN INCEST AMONG MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 60 (3c) , 1159-1165
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1987.60.3c.1159
Abstract
Attribution of blame was examined in three samples differing in education and experience (38 undergraduates, 31 graduate students, 37 MA clinicians). 106 subjects completed the Jackson Incest Blame Scale, which yields four blame factors, situation, victim, society, and offender. The four factor scores were analyzed using 2 (sex) .times. 3 (education) analysis of variance. Attribution of blame decreased as a function of more education. The blame scores of men were significantly higher than those of women on all factors except offender. The percentage of graduate students and clinicians indicating a history of sexual abuse fell in the upper range of estimates of the incidence. Individuals with histories of abuse differed only on their attribution of blame to situational factors.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- Group Treatment: Adult Victims of Childhood Sexual AbuseSocial Casework, 1985
- Treating Female Adult Survivors of Childhood IncestSocial Casework, 1984
- Problems of Sexually Abused Girls and Their TreatmentPublished by SAGE Publications ,1984
- The Incestuous Family RevisitedSocial Casework, 1983
- A comprehensive child sexual abuse treatment programChild Abuse & Neglect, 1982
- Group Therapy with Sexually Abused AdolescentsThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1982
- Father–daughter incest.Professional Psychology, 1981
- Incestuous child sexual abuse: A review of treatment strategiesClinical Psychology Review, 1981
- Social Perception of the Victim's Causal Role in Rape: An Exploratory Examination of Four FactorsHuman Relations, 1976