Do Physicians Modify Their Prehospital Management of Patients in Response to a Public Campaign on Chest Pain?
- 15 June 1998
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 81 (12) , 1433-1438
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00202-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcome of Acute Myocardial Infarction According to the Specialty of the Admitting PhysicianNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Impact of a public campaign on pre-hospital delay in patients reporting chest pain.Heart, 1996
- Cardiologist versus internist management of patients with unstable angina: Treatment patterns and outcomesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Variation in Office-Based QualityJAMA, 1995
- Knowledge and Practices of Generalist and Specialist Physicians Regarding Drug Therapy for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Pre-hospital opiate and aspirin administration in patients with suspected myocardial infarctionBMJ, 1994
- Use of aspirin by general practitioners in suspected acute myocardial infarctionBMJ, 1994
- Impact of hospital thrombolysis policy on out-of-hospital response to suspected myocardial infarctionThe Lancet, 1993
- Time delays in provision of thrombolytic treatment in six district hospitals. Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and a Cardiology Committee of Royal College of Physicians of London.BMJ, 1992
- Patient and general practitioner delays in acute myocardial infarctionBMJ, 1988