Influence of Surgical Subspecialty Training on In-Hospital Mortality for Gastrectomy and Colectomy Patients
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 238 (4) , 629-639
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000089855.96280.4a
Abstract
Objective: This study examined the relationship of surgeon subspecialty training and interests to in-hospital mortality while controlling for both hospital and surgeon volume. Summary Background Data: The relationship between volume of surgical procedures and in-hospital mortality has been studied and shows an inverse relationship. Methods: A large Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System was used to identify all 55,016 inpatients who underwent gastrectomy (n = 6434) or colectomy (n = 48,582) between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2001. Surgical subspecialty training and interest was defined as surgeons who were members of the Society of Surgical Oncology (training/interest; n = 68) or the Society of Colorectal Surgery (training; n = 61) during the study period. The association of in-hospital mortality and subspecialty training/interest was examined using a logistic regression model, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, insurance status, and hospital and surgeon volume. Results: Overall mortality for colectomy patients was 4.6%; the adjusted mortality rate for subspecialty versus nonsubspecialty-trained surgeons was 2.4% versus 4.8%, respectively (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34, 0.60; P < 0.0001). Gastrectomy patients experienced an overall mortality rate of 8.4%; the adjusted mortality rate for patients treated by subspecialty trained surgeons was 6.5%, while the adjusted mortality rate for nonsubspecialty trained surgeons was 8.7% (adjusted OR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.46, 1.08; P = 0.10). Conclusions: For gastrectomies and colectomies, risk-adjusted mortality is substantially lower when performed by subspecialty interested and trained surgeons, even after accounting for hospital and surgeon volume and patient characteristics. These findings may have implications for surgical training programs and for regionalization of complex surgical procedures.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the LiteratureAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancerSurgery, 2002
- The role of hospital volume in coronary artery bypass grafting: is more always better?11>Presented, in part, at the Annual Meeting of the American Heart Association in New Orleans, Louisiana, on November 13, 2000.Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: Potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiativeSurgery, 2001
- The Relation between Volume and Outcome in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal dataStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Does Practice Make Perfect?Medical Care, 1984
- The Relation Between Surgical Volume and Mortality: An Exploration of Causal Factors and Alternative ModelsMedical Care, 1980
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979