The International Normalized Ratio
- 14 February 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 154 (3) , 282-288
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1994.00420030084008
Abstract
With the increasing use of the international normalized ratio (INR) to monitor warfarin therapy, a number of problems with prothrombin time (PT) testing have been identified that have led some laboratory physicians to question the reliability of the INR.1This is ironic, because it was the introduction of the INR system that brought to light some of the long-standing problems with the technique of PT monitoring. However, these problems are not insurmountable if a compromise can be reached between the expectations of laboratory physicians and of clinicians. Thus, the laboratory physician seeks a perfect assay system, which in the case of the INR is unattainable at present, because of differences in PT reagents and methods. In contrast, the clinician is satisfied with a system of monitoring that provides safe and effective warfarin dosing. This goal can be achieved provided that certain details of PT testing are observed. In this communication, which is directed to practicing clinicians, the potential problems with the INR system are discussed, their clinical relevance is critically reviewed, and solutions are offered.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The correction of coagulometer effects on international normalized ratios: a multicentre evaluationBritish Journal of Haematology, 1994
- Comparison of native prothrombin antigen with the prothrombin time for monitoring oral anticoagulant prophylaxis.Circulation, 1993
- Failure of the International Normalized Ratio to Generate Consistent Results Within a Local Medical CommunityAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1993
- Automation and prothrombin time: a United Kingdom field study of two widely used coagulometers.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1990
- Comparison of thromboplastins using the ISI and INR systemPathology, 1990
- Survey of prothrombin time in National External Quality Assessment Scheme exercises (1980-87).Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1988
- The reliability of international normalized ratios during short-term oral anticoagulant treatmentClinical and Laboratory Haematology, 1988
- Laboratory control of oral anticoagulants.BMJ, 1987
- One-stage Prothrombin Time SurveyAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1970
- The Effect of the Use of Different Tissue Extracts on One-Stage Prothrombin TimesActa Haematologica, 1964