Feasibility and effects of the semirecumbent position to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia: A randomized study*
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 34 (2) , 396-402
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000198529.76602.5e
Abstract
Reducing aspiration of gastric contents by placing mechanically ventilated patients in a semirecumbent position has been associated with lower incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The feasibility and efficacy of this intervention in a larger patient population, however, are unknown. Assessment of the feasibility of the semirecumbent position for intensive care unit patients and its influence on development of VAP. In a prospective multicentered trial, critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to the semirecumbent position, with a target backrest elevation of 45°, or standard care (i.e., supine position) with a backrest elevation of 10°. Backrest elevation was measured continuously during the first week of ventilation with a monitor-linked device. A deviation of position was defined as a change of the randomized position >5°. Diagnosis of VAP was made by quantitative cultures of samples obtained by bronchoscopic techniques. One hundred nine patients were assigned to the supine group and 112 to the semirecumbent group. Baseline characteristics were comparable for both groups. Average elevations were 9.8° and 16.1° at day 1 and day 7, respectively, for the supine group and 28.1° and 22.6° at day 1 and day 7, respectively, for the semirecumbent group (p < .001). The target semirecumbent position of 45° was not achieved for 85% of the study time, and these patients more frequently changed position than supine-positioned patients. VAP was diagnosed in eight patients (6.5%) in the supine group and in 13 (10.7%) in the semirecumbent group (NS), after a mean of 6 (range, 3–9) and 7 (range, 3–12) days, respectively. There were no differences in numbers of patients undergoing enteral feeding, receiving stress ulcer prophylaxis, or developing pressure sores or in mortality rates or duration of ventilation and intensive care unit stay between the groups. The targeted backrest elevation of 45° for semirecumbent positioning was not reached in the conditions of the present randomized study. The achieved difference in treatment position (28° vs. 10°) did not prevent the development of VAP.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Toward understanding evidence uptake: Semirecumbency for pneumonia preventionCritical Care Medicine, 2002
- Supine body position as a risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Effect of Nasogastric Tube Size on Gastroesophageal Reflux and Microaspiration in Intubated PatientsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- Role of Colonization of the Upper Intestinal Tract in the Pathogenesis of Ventilator-Associated PneumoniaClinical Infectious Diseases, 1997
- The Prevalence of Nosocomial Infection in Intensive Care Units in EuropeJAMA, 1995
- Patient Selection for Clinical Investigation of Ventilator-Associated PneumoniaChest, 1992
- Gastroesophageal Reflux in Intubated Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition: Effect of Supine and Semirecumbent PositionsJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1992
- Pulmonary Aspiration of Gastric Contents in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: The Effect of Body PositionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Association of Respiratory Tract Colonization with Adherence of Gram-Negative Bacilli to Epithelial CellsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1979
- Nosocomial Respiratory Infections with Gram-Negative BacilliAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1972