Takeover Bidding with Toeholds: The Case of the Owner's Curse
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 11 (4) , 679-704
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/11.4.679
Abstract
This article demonstrates that a potential acquirer with a toehold bids aggressively and possibly overpays in equilibrium. The aggressiveness of a bidder with a toehold increases further if he is able to renege on his winning bid. A bidder without a toehold, however, responds by shading his bids. The target firm can increase competition and the expected sale price if it only entertains nonretractable bids. This article provides testable implications on the probability of bidder success, stock price reactions on bid revisions and on resolution of the contest, and expected gains to bidders and the target firm.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shareholder wealth effects of corporate takeovers: The U.K. experience 1955–1985Published by Elsevier ,2002
- Initial Shareholdings and Overbidding in Takeover ContestsThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Pre-Tender Offer Share Acquisition Strategy in TakeoversJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1994
- Motives for Takeovers: An Empirical InvestigationJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1993
- The Strategic Role of Debt in Takeover ContestsThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firmsJournal of Financial Economics, 1988
- Successful Takeovers without ExclusionThe Review of Financial Studies, 1988
- A Theory of Preemptive Takeover BiddingThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1988
- Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate MergersThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1981
- Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the CorporationThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1980