Control Rights and Capital Structure: An Empirical Investigation
- 11 August 2008
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We show that incentive conflicts between firms and their creditors have a large impact on corporate debt policy. Net debt issuing activity experiences a sharp and persistent decline following debt covenant violations, when creditors use their acceleration and termination rights to increase interest rates and reduce the availability of credit. The effect of creditor actions on debt policy is strongest when the borrower's alternative sources of finance are costly. In addition, despite the less favorable terms offered by existing creditors, borrowers rarely switch lenders following a violation.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Capital Structure Decisions: Which Factors are Reliably Important?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- The economic implications of corporate financial reportingJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2005
- How Does Industry Affect Firm Financial Structure?The Review of Financial Studies, 2005
- Are Firms Underleveraged? An Examination of the Effect of Leverage on Default ProbabilitiesThe Journal of Finance, 2005
- Testing the pecking order theory of capital structurePublished by Elsevier ,2002
- The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the fieldJournal of Financial Economics, 2001
- How Big Are the Tax Benefits of Debt?The Journal of Finance, 2000
- Capital Structure and Corporate Control: The Effect of Antitakeover Statutes on Firm LeverageThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- Proxies for the corporate marginal tax rateJournal of Financial Economics, 1996
- Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not haveJournal of Financial Economics, 1984