The Effects of a Supplemental Perceptual Training Program on Reading Achievement

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
At the beginning of the first grade, 105 students designated as potential reading problems were divided into three groups of 35 children each: experimental I, which received supplementary perceptual training in addition to the regular reading program; experimental II, which received traditional supplementary reading instruction in addition to the regular reading program; and the control group, which received no supplementary instruction. The Metropolitan Achievement Test (MAT) was administered at the end of May. The statistical analysis of the data indicated that, of all the groups, only the experimental I total group and the experimental I boys read significantly better than the respective control groups on the reading subtest of the MAT.