Prenatal Diagnosis -- Why Is 35 a Magic Number?
- 21 April 1994
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 330 (16) , 1151-1152
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199404213301610
Abstract
For the past two decades, routine amniocentesis has been recommended only for women who are at least 35 years old,1 because at that age the risk of miscarriage induced by the test is roughly equal to the risk of trisomy 21, the most prevalent nonfatal chromosomal abnormality causing mental retardation and morbidity. That rationale assumes that having a miscarriage and having a child with Down's syndrome are equivalent outcomes. But using 35 years as the threshold age ignores the other chromosomal abnormalities that might prompt some couples to terminate a pregnancy, the level of accuracy of the test, and the . . .Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reducing the Need for Amniocentesis in Women 35 Years of Age or Older with Serum Markers for ScreeningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Effect of Prenatal Ultrasound Screening on Perinatal OutcomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome with Use of Maternal Serum MarkersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome: the effect of routine ultrasound scan determination of gestational age and adjustment for maternal weightBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992