Future employment selection methods: evaluating social networking web sites
Top Cited Papers
- 14 August 2009
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Managerial Psychology
- Vol. 24 (6) , 567-580
- https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910974134
Abstract
Purpose – The use of social networking web sites (SNWs), like Facebook and MySpace, has become extremely popular, particularly with today's emerging workforce. Employers, aware of this phenomenon, have begun to use the personal information available on SNWs to make hiring decisions. The purpose of this paper is to examine the feasibility of using applicant personal information currently available on SNWs to improve employment selection decisions. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 378 judge ratings (63 raters×6 subjects) are evaluated to determine if raters can reliably and accurately determine the big-five personality traits, intelligence, and performance based only on information available on SNWs. Interrater reliability is assessed to determine rater consistency, followed by an assessment of rater accuracy. Findings – Based solely on viewing social networking profiles, judges are consistent in their ratings across subjects and typically able to accurately distinguish high from low performers. In addition, raters who are more intelligent and emotionally stable outperformed their counterparts. Practical implications – Human resource (HR) professionals are currently evaluating social networking information prior to hiring applicants. Since SNWs contain substantial personal information which could be argued to cause adverse impact, academic studies are needed to determine whether SNWs can be reliable and valid predictors of important organizational criteria. Originality/value – This paper is the first, as far as the authors are concerned, to address the use of SNWs in employment selection, despite their current utilization by HR practitioners.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Failure of Social Desirability Measures to Capture Applicant Faking BehaviorIndustrial and Organizational Psychology, 2008
- Revisiting the Origins of the Typical-Maximum Performance DistinctionHuman Performance, 2007
- The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measuresPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- e-Perceptions: Personality Impressions Based on Personal Websites.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004
- Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance in Army and Civil Occupations: A European PerspectiveHuman Performance, 1998
- Validity of Customer Service Measures in Personnel Selection: A Review of Criterion and Construct EvidenceHuman Performance, 1998
- Gender, age, and race differences on overt integrity tests: Results across four large-scale job applicant datasets.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998
- Who should own the definition of personality?European Journal of Personality, 1994
- Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994
- The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.Psychological Assessment, 1992