A relative survival regression model using B‐spline functions to model non‐proportional hazards
- 19 August 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 22 (17) , 2767-2784
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1484
Abstract
Relative survival, a method for assessing prognostic factors for disease‐specific mortality in unselected populations, is frequently used in population‐based studies. However, most relative survival models assume that the effects of covariates on disease‐specific mortality conform with the proportional hazards hypothesis, which may not hold in some long‐term studies. To accommodate variation over time of a predictor's effect on disease‐specific mortality, we developed a new relative survival regression model using B‐splines to model the hazard ratio as a flexible function of time, without having to specify a particular functional form. Our method also allows for testing the hypotheses of hazards proportionality and no association on disease‐specific hazard. Accuracy of estimation and inference were evaluated in simulations. The method is illustrated by an analysis of a population‐based study of colon cancer. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time-Dependent Hazard Ratio: Modeling and Hypothesis Testing with Application in Lupus NephritisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Proportional excess hazardsBiometrika, 1996
- Hazard RegressionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Flexible Methods for Analyzing Survival Data Using Splines, with Applications to Breast Cancer PrognosisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1992
- Nonparametric Survival Analysis with Time-Dependent Covariate Effects: A Penalized Partial Likelihood ApproachThe Annals of Statistics, 1990
- Flexible regression models with cubic splinesStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- Monotone Regression Splines in ActionStatistical Science, 1988
- Regression Analysis of Relative Survival RatesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1987