Randomization Inference in the Regression Discontinuity Design: An Application to Party Advantages in the U.S. Senate
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2015
- journal article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Journal of Causal Inference
- Vol. 3 (1) , 1-24
- https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2013-0010
Abstract
In the Regression Discontinuity (RD) design, units are assigned a treatment based on whether their value of an observed covariate is above or below a fixed cutoff. Under the assumption that the distribution of potential confounders changes continuously around the cutoff, the discontinuous jump in the probability of treatment assignment can be used to identify the treatment effect. Although a recent strand of the RD literature advocates interpreting this design as a local randomized experiment, the standard approach to estimation and inference is based solely on continuity assumptions that do not justify this interpretation. In this article, we provide precise conditions in a randomization inference context under which this interpretation is directly justified and develop exact finite-sample inference procedures based on them. Our randomization inference framework is motivated by the observation that only a few observations might be available close enough to the threshold where local randomization is plausible, and hence standard large-sample procedures may be suspect. Our proposed methodology is intended as a complement and a robustness check to standard RD inference approaches. We illustrate our framework with a study of two measures of party-level advantage in U.S. Senate elections, where the number of close races is small and our framework is well suited for the empirical analysis.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantile treatment effects in the regression discontinuity designJournal of Econometrics, 2012
- Attributing Effects to a Cluster-Randomized Get-Out-the-Vote CampaignJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2009
- Regression discontinuity inference with specification errorJournal of Econometrics, 2008
- Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House electionsJournal of Econometrics, 2007
- Splitting the Difference? Causal Inference and Theories of Split-party DelegationsPolitical Analysis, 2006
- Robust, Accurate Confidence Intervals with a Weak Instrument: Quarter of Birth and EducationJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2004
- Sequential Choices and Partisan Transitions in U.S. Senate Delegations: 1972-1988The Journal of Politics, 1995
- Estimating Incumbency Advantage without BiasAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1990
- Statistics and Causal InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional ElectionsPolity, 1971