Why Do Firms Train? Theory and Evidence
- 1 February 1998
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Vol. 113 (1) , 79-119
- https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555531
Abstract
This paper offers a theory of training whereby workers do not pay for the general training they receive. The superior information of the current employer regarding its employees' abilities relative to other firms creates ex post monopsony power, and encourages this employer to provide and pay for training, even if these skills are general. The model can lead to multiple equlibria. In one equilibrium quits are endogenously high, and as a result employers have limited monopsony power and provide little training, while in another equilibrium quits are low and training is high. Using microdata on German apprentices, we show that the predictions of our model receive some support from the data.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Training and Innovation in an Imperfect Labour MarketThe Review of Economic Studies, 1997
- Human Capital Investment under Asymmetric Information: The Pigovian Conjecture RevisitedJournal of Labor Economics, 1996
- Why Do Firms Train? Theory and EvidencePublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1996
- LABOR TURNOVER IN THE USA AND JAPAN: A TALE OF TWO COUNTRIESPacific Economic Review, 1996
- A framework for understanding differences in labor turnover and human capital investmentJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1995
- Specific Capital, Adverse Selection, and Turnover: A Comparison of the United States and JapanJournal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1994
- Layoffs and LemonsJournal of Labor Economics, 1991
- Worker Characteristics, Job Characteristics, and the Receipt of On-the-Job TrainingILR Review, 1991
- Signaling Games and Stable EquilibriaThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987
- Adverse Selection in the Labour MarketThe Review of Economic Studies, 1986