Maze learning: Reliability and equivalence of alternate pathways
- 1 May 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Clinical Neuropsychologist
- Vol. 3 (2) , 137-144
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13854048908403286
Abstract
The equivalence of a popular Austin Maze path and an alternate mirror reflection was examined in a sample of 44 university students (22 male, 22 female) under a counterbalanced latin square design. While all subjects performed better on the pathway administered second, the two paths were equivalent in difficulty. There was also evidence of a sex difference favouring the males. Correlation coefficients indicated that the Maze displayed alternate-form reliability equal to or better than other popular clinical tests of such learning.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Learning in Young AlcoholicsJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1988
- Cognitive gender differences are disappearing.American Psychologist, 1988
- Performance on the Austin Maze: Steps towards normative dataAustralian Psychologist, 1987
- Pure Topographical Disorientation: A Definition and Anatomical BasisCortex, 1987
- Dissociable visual and spatial impairments following right posterior cerebral lesions: Clinical, neuropsychological and anatomical evidenceNeuropsychologia, 1987
- Alternate form reliability and equivalency of the rey auditory verbal learning testJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1986
- Selective reminding test: An examination of the equivalence of four formsJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1985
- Loss of Topographic Memory with Learning DeficitsCortex, 1980
- Wechsler memory scale: A selective review of the literatureJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1978
- The Relative Economy of Various Modes of Attack in the Mastery of a Stylus Maze.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1924