A prospective, randomised and blinded comparison of first shock success of monophasic and biphasic waveforms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Resuscitation
- Vol. 58 (1) , 17-24
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00106-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion on Ventricular Defibrillation Patterns, Energy Requirements, and Detection of RecoveryCirculation, 2002
- Equivalence of the standard monophasic waveform shocks delivered by automated external defibrillators?Resuscitation, 2002
- Part 4: The Automated External Defibrillator: Key Link in the Chain of SurvivalResuscitation, 2000
- Part 6: Advanced Cardiovascular Life SupportResuscitation, 2000
- A C OMPARISON OF B IPHASIC AND M ONOPHASIC S HOCKS FOR E XTERNAL D EFIBRILLATIONPrehospital Emergency Care, 2000
- The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial functionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Transthoracic Defibrillation of Swine With Monophasic and Biphasic WaveformsCirculation, 1995
- A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humansJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- A new rhythm library for testing automatic external defibrillators: Performance of three devicesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Discrete Sequential Boundaries for Clinical TrialsBiometrika, 1983