How does computer-aided diagnosis improve the management of acute abdominal pain?
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- Vol. 74 (1) , 40-6
Abstract
The introduction of standardised data-collection forms and computer-aided diagnosis has been found to be associated with improved diagnosis and management of patients with acute abdominal pain. The mechanism by which such benefits accrue has been the subject of some controversy. Detailed analysis of 5193 patients from one hospital shows that the major benefit from such diagnostic aids was the accurate early diagnosis of non-specific abdominal pain by senior house officers in the accident and emergency department; this in turn led to fewer admissions and fewer operations with negative findings. Clinical data about patients with acute abdominal pain should be recorded on structured information sheets by junior doctors and early positive diagnosis should be encouraged before decisions affecting the patient's management are made. Improved computer support may confer further benefits.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- 12 YEARS EXPERIENCE OF COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS IN A DISTRICT GENERAL-HOSPITAL1990
- Making better decisions: construction of clinical scoring systems by the Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones approach.BMJ, 1990
- HOW ACCURATE IS COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS?The Lancet, 1989
- Computer-aided diagnosis: A reviewBritish Journal of Surgery, 1989
- Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults.1987
- Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal painBMJ, 1986
- Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study.BMJ, 1986
- Statistical Methodology for Evaluating Gastrointestinal SymptomsClinics in Gastroenterology, 1985
- Allocation of patients to treatment groups in a controlled clinical studyBritish Journal of Cancer, 1978
- The diagnosis of acute abdominal pain with computer analysis.1976