Ambivalent statements in contingent valuation studies: inclusive response formats and giving respondents time to think
Open Access
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
- Vol. 51 (1) , 91-107
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00346.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertaintyJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003
- Yea-Saying in Contingent Valuation SurveysLand Economics, 1999
- Construal Processes in Preference AssessmentJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1999
- Decisiveness, attitude expression and symbolic responses in contingent valuation surveysJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1998
- Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public GoodsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1997
- How Precise Are Monetary Representations of Environmental Improvements?Land Economics, 1995
- Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparityJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1994
- Interval Estimates of Non-Market Resource Values from Referendum Contingent Valuation SurveysLand Economics, 1991
- Yea-Saying, Nay-Saying, and Going to Extremes: Black-White Differences in Response StylesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1984
- Informal social communication.Psychological Review, 1950