Electrohydraulic Nephrolithotripsy: a Preferable Alternative to Ultrasound?
- 1 December 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 56 (6) , 589-593
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1984.tb06123.x
Abstract
Summary— Three hundred patients have undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy in our unit; 66 required disintegration of their renal calculi, 24 by electrohydraulic lithotresis (EHL) and 42 by ultrasonic lithotresis (USL). EHL has been associated with a lower residual stone rate, a reduced number of repeat endoscopic sessions and no additional complications. EHL has been shown to be efficient, safe and preferable to USL. The occurrence of residual stone fragments following disintegration suggests that mechanical extraction should be used whenever possible and that disintegration, whether by electrohydraulic or ultrasonic lithotresis, should be reserved for stones which are either impacted or too large for mechanical extraction.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nephrolithotony: Percutaneous removal of renal calculiUrologic Radiology, 1984
- Percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsyUrologic Radiology, 1984
- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Advances in equipment and endoscopic techniquesUrology, 1984
- Explosive nephrolithopaxy: Reality or fiction?Urology, 1984
- Disintegration of Renal and Ureteral Calculi with UltrasoundUrologic Clinics of North America, 1983
- New techniques for the treatment and disruption of renal calculiJournal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 1983
- Electrohydraulic ureterolithotripsy Preliminary reportUrology, 1978
- Electrohydraulic cystolithotripsyUrology, 1976
- Electrohydraulic nephrolithotripsyUrology, 1975
- Die elektrische Lithotripsie von Steinen der Harnwege unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der transvesikalen UretersteinzertrümmerungEndoscopy, 1970