Does the specific intravascular ultrasound criterion used to optimize stent expansion have an impact on the probability of stent restenosis?
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 83 (7) , 1012-1017
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00006-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of in-stent restenosisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Randomized Multicenter Comparison of Conventional Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy in Unplanned and Elective Coronary StentingCirculation, 1998
- Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study (MUSIC Study)European Heart Journal, 1998
- Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6-month restenosis rate: a multicenter, randomized study comparing two strategies—with and without intravascular ultrasound guidanceJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Intravascular Ultrasound Predictors of Angiographic Restenosis in Lesions Treated With Palmaz-Schatz StentsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Comparison of Immediate and Intermediate-Term Results of Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Palmaz-Schatz Stent Implantation in Matched LesionsCirculation, 1997
- A Randomized Comparison of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy after the Placement of Coronary-Artery StentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Intracoronary Stenting Without Anticoagulation Accomplished With Intravascular Ultrasound GuidanceCirculation, 1995
- Benefit of intracoronary ultrasound in the deployment of Palmaz-Schatz stentsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- The importance of acute luminal diameter in determining restenosis after coronary atherectomy or stenting.Circulation, 1992