Intradermal versus subcutaneous immunization with typhoid vaccine
- 1 February 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Epidemiology and Infection
- Vol. 84 (1) , 11-16
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022172400026462
Abstract
SUMMARY: Swedish nationals about to travel abroad were immunized against typhoid with a monovalent heat-inactivated vaccine which was administered intra- or subcutaneously. No major differences in serum antibody response were noted in the two groups of vaccinees as determined with direct agglutination and indirect hemagglutination techniques. As the intracutaneous route caused fewer adverse reactions this way of administration seems to be preferable.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Boosting of Secretory IgA Antibody Responses in Man by Parenteral Cholera VaccinationScandinavian Journal of Immunology, 1977
- LEVEL DIAGNOSIS OF SYMPTOMATIC URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS IN CHILDHOODActa Paediatrica, 1975
- Characterization of precipitating antibodies to E. coli O antigen in infants and children with acute pyelonephritis.1971
- Immunization of man with typhoid and cholera vaccine. Agglutinating antibodies after intracutaneous and subcutaneous injectionEpidemiology and Infection, 1967
- T.A.B. ReactionsBMJ, 1964
- T.A.B. ReactionsBMJ, 1964
- Intradermal TAB immunization against enteric infectionsEpidemiology and Infection, 1963
- Bacterial hemagglutination and hemolysis.1956
- Typhoid Vaccine Studies IX. Intracutaneous versus Subcutaneous Vaccination for Initial ImmunizationAmerican Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 1944
- Comparative Study of the Antibody Response After Various Methods of Administration of Mixed Typhoid Vaccine: With Particular Reference to the Intradermal and Oral MethodsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1932