The two-phase approximation for black hole collisions: is it robust?
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- letter
- Published by IOP Publishing in Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Vol. 14 (5) , L77-L82
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/14/5/001
Abstract
Recently, Abrahams and Cook devised a method of estimating the total radiated energy resulting from collisions of distant black holes by applying Newtonian evolution to the holes up to the point where a common apparent horizon forms around the two black holes and subsequently applying Schwarzschild perturbation techniques. Despite the crudeness of their method, their results for the case of head-on collisions were surprisingly accurate. Here we take advantage of the simple radiated energy formula devised in the close-slow approximation for black hole collisions to test how strongly the Abrahams - Cook result depends on the choice of moment when the method of evolution switches over from Newtonian to general relativistic evolution. We find that their result is robust, not depending strongly on this choice.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Collision of boosted black holesPhysical Review D, 1997
- Applying black hole perturbation theory to numerically generated spacetimesPhysical Review D, 1996
- Head-on collision of two black holes: Comparison of different approachesPhysical Review D, 1995
- Collisions of boosted black holes: Perturbation theory prediction of gravitational radiationPhysical Review D, 1994
- Colliding black holes: The close limitPhysical Review Letters, 1994
- Collision of two black holesPhysical Review Letters, 1993
- Initial data for axisymmetric black-hole collisionsPhysical Review D, 1991
- Time-asymmetric initial data for black holes and black-hole collisionsPhysical Review D, 1980