Assessment of treatment for patients with primary ductal carcinoma in situ in the breast
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 5 (8) , 724-732
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02303484
Abstract
Background: Current mammographic technology has resulted in increased detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). It is necessary to assess which patients presenting with DCIS are good candidates for breast conservation and which of these patients should receive adjuvant radiation. Methods: We accrued clinical data for 124 patients with a primary diagnosis of DCIS from 1979 through 1994. Primary therapy was a mastectomy for 18 patients, and a lumpectomy for 106 patients. Only 18 of the latter group of patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. For the 88 lumpectomy-alone patients (median follow-up, 5.2 years), we evaluated the effects of clinical (age and initial presentation) and pathologic (nuclear grade, architecture, parenchymal involvement, calcifications, and measured margins) factors on recurrence of DCIS or the development of invasive breast cancer. Results: Patients who underwent lumpectomy with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (median follow-up, 5.0 years) were significantly more likely to have recurrence of DCIS (P=.05) than those who underwent mastectomy (median follow-up, 6.7 years): 18% (19/106) versus 0% (0/18), respectively; lumpectomy-alone patients experienced a 19% (17/88) rate of DCIS recurrence. All recurrent DCIS was ipsilateral. For lumpectomy-alone patients, the factors associated with ipsilateral recurrence of DCIS were extent of involvement of the parenchyma (P=.01, for univariate;P=.07, for multivariate) and initial presentation (P=.05, for univariate;P=.07, for multivariate). Eleven lumpectomy-alone patients developed invasive breast cancer (6 ipsilateral, 5 contralateral); none of the 18 lumpectomy patients who received adjuvant radiation developed invasive disease. None of the factors investigated, including primary surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, were associated with a significant effect on the development of invasive disease. Conclusions: Longer follow-up is required to determine if the benefits of either mastectomy or radiotherapy following lumpectomy persist. There is a suggestion that patients under 40 years of age or women who present with nipple discharge might be considered for either adjuvant radiotherapy following lumpectomy or a simple mastectomy.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing genetic markers of tumour progression in the context of intratumour heterogeneityCytometry, 1998
- Incidence and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breastEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1997
- Alternative multivariate modelling for time to local recurrence for breast cancer patients receiving a lumpectomy aloneSurgical Oncology, 1996
- An improved statistical approach: Can it clarify the role of new prognostic factors for breast cancer?European Journal Of Cancer, 1996
- Breast Cancer Death Rates Decline for White WomenJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1995
- Changing trends: An overview of breast cancer incidence and mortalityCancer, 1994
- One Century of Mammary Carcinoma In Situ:What Have We Learned?American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1993
- Lumpectomy Compared with Lumpectomy and Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Intraductal Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Noninvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: The relevance of histologic categorizationHuman Pathology, 1993
- Mammographically detected duct carcinoma in situ. Frequency of local recurrence following tylectomy and prognostic effect of nuclear grade on local recurrenceCancer, 1989