Evaluation of a Breast Mass
- 18 March 1993
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 328 (11) , 810-812
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199303183281115
Abstract
The Current Concepts article by Donegan (Sept. 24 issue)1 on the management of palpable breast masses raises several important issues that should be clarified. Although the term “diagnostic mammography” is commonly used, mammography is rarely diagnostic in the sense of “distinguishing one disease from another”2. Mammography is almost exclusively a screening technique. It is rare that the mammogram can characterize a palpable lesion sufficiently that no further evaluation is needed. Even specially targeted mammographic views may fail to image the palpable abnormality. Mammography should be used in a woman who has a mass, but it should be used primarily to screen the clinically normal, ipsilateral breast tissue and the contralateral breast in order to detect occult cancer3.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of a Palpable Breast MassNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Fine-needle aspiration cytology in the detection of breast cancer in nonsuspicious lesions.Radiology, 1992
- Value of large-core biopsy of occult breast lesions.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1992
- Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies.Radiology, 1991
- Efficacy of automated biopsy guns versus conventional biopsy needles in the pygmy pig.Radiology, 1990
- Breast cancer visualized by mammography in patients under 35.Radiology, 1983
- Mammography after needle aspiration of palpable breast massesThe American Journal of Surgery, 1983
- Effects of needle aspiration on the mammographic appearance of the breast: a guide to the proper timing of the mammography examination.Radiology, 1982
- Palpable breast masses. The importance of preoperative mammographyJAMA, 1981