Ecology of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) in subtropical Australia. III. Modelling populations on different breeds of cattle
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CSIRO Publishing in Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
- Vol. 39 (2) , 309-318
- https://doi.org/10.1071/ar9880309
Abstract
The numbers of cattle ticks, Boophi1us microplus, were counted on cattle, with different Bos indicus (zebu) content in central and southern Queensland, from November 1977 to May 1982. Concurrently, measurements were made of the survival rates of parasitic stages of the tick and of the success of free-living stages in producing larval progeny. These measurements were related to the tick burdens on the cattle in order to test current understanding of the ecology of the tick.Tick numbers increased exponentially with decreasing Bos indicus content. Tick numbers built up very rapidly on the Bos taurus cattle and resulted in deaths early in the first season, so the herd was replaced with animals of 25% zebu content. The pure zebu animals carried an average of five ticks per animal per day in central Queensland and only one in southern Queensland. The 50% zebu herds carried 65 ticks per day in central Queensland and 1 l in southern Queensland, compared with 79 and 37 on the 25% zebu herds at the two locations. During their brief time in the experiment the B. taurus animals carried 465 and 302 ticks per day in central and southern Queensland respectively.The observed tick infestation levels were estimated to cause annual losses of liveweight gain of 1, 14 and 17 kg in zebu, 50% zebu and 25% zebu animals respectively in central Queensland. Comparative figures for southern Queensland were 0, 2 and 8 kg. Compensatory liveweight gain would have reduced these losses by up to 6 kg. These data relate to animals which were breeding most of the time and hence were less resistant than dry cattle. The results indicate that B. microplus has been reduced to a marginal problem on animals with 50% zebu genes in the region. It is therefore difficull to justify any control measures in southern areas, particularly when they could increase the risk of babesiosis. Owners of B. taurus cattle will continue to be at risk of major losses in productivity.Changes in the tick burden on the herd5 were explained mostly by changes in survival rates of parasitic ticks in central Queensland and by changes in availability of larvae on the pastures in southern Queensland.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Boophilus microplus tick burdens on grazing cattle in ColombiaTropical Animal Health and Production, 1984
- A Framework for Integrating Control Methods Against the Cattle Tick, Boophilus microplus in AustraliaJournal of Applied Ecology, 1983
- The effect of cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) on the growth of Bos indicus × B. taurus steersAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1983
- A model of the survival of larvae of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus, on pastureAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1983
- Tick infestations and their effects on growth of Bos indicus × Bos taurus cattle in the wet tropicsAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1983
- THE TRANSMISSION OFBABESIA BOVISIN HERDS OF EUROPEAN AND ZEBU X EUROPEAN CATTLE INFESTED WITH THE TICK, BOOPHILUS MICROPLUSAustralian Veterinary Journal, 1981
- The effect of two systems of cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) control on tick populations, transmission of Babesia spp. and Anaplasma spp. and production of Brahman crossbred cattle in the dry tropicsAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1981
- Density Dependent Mortality of the Tick, Boophilus microplus, on Cattle-Further ObservationsJournal of Applied Ecology, 1979
- Long-term population studies on the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) on untreated cattle selected for different levels of tick resistanceAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1979
- Aspects of Host Finding by the Cattle Tick, Boophilus microplus.Australian Journal of Zoology, 1978