Chlamydia trachomatis and oral contraceptive use: a quantitative review.
Open Access
- 1 August 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Sexually Transmitted Infections
- Vol. 68 (4) , 209-216
- https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.68.4.209
Abstract
OBJECTIVES--Chlamydia trachomatis is now recognised as a major sexually transmitted disease; oral contraceptive use is rapidly increasing particularly in developing countries. There are thus important public health implications of the many reports that isolation of C trachomatis is more frequent among users of oral contraceptives. The aim of this analysis was to assess the strength and consistency of this association by summarising published studies between 1972 and 1990. DESIGN--Studies identified were grouped according to whether they were prospective or case-control studies. Data were extracted and pooled estimates of the unadjusted odds ratios were made for all studies, as well as for sub-groups defined by an index of study quality, background prevalence of C trachomatis, and the contraceptive comparison being made. LOCATION--Studies in the analysis were mainly conducted in Europe and North America; the meta-analysis was done at the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. RESULTS--The pooled estimated unadjusted odds ratio for 29 case-control studies examined was 1.93 (95% CI, 1.77-2.11), indicating an almost twofold increased risk of chlamydial infection for oral contraceptive users. Neither study quality nor prevalence of C trachomatis modified this risk. When compared to the use of barrier contraceptives, however, the risk of infection for women using oral contraceptives increased to 2.91 (95% CI, 1.86-4.55). The pooled estimated protective effect of barrier methods in these studies was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.22-0.54). CONCLUSIONS--Cross-study comparisons of the relationship between oral contraceptive use and chlamydial infection are limited by the design and analysis of many component studies which did not control for confounding factors such as sexual behaviour and age. The almost twofold risk of increased chlamydial infection for oral contraceptive users, supported by the findings of two prospective studies, however, points to the importance of considering the risks and benefits of oral contraceptive use in women who are likely to be exposed to C trachomatis and other STDs. The protective effect of barrier methods emphasizes the continued need for promoting barrier methods of contraception.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection and oral contraceptive use among adolescent girlsJournal of Adolescent Health Care, 1989
- The significance and scope of reproductive tract infections among Third World womenInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1989
- The link between contraceptive methods andChlamydia trachomatis infectionAdvances in Contraception, 1988
- Historical and clinical factors associated with Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in female adolescentsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1988
- Lower Genital Tract Infections in Women: Comparison of Clinical and Epidemiologic Findings with MicrobiologySexually Transmitted Diseases, 1988
- Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1988
- Chlamydia trachomatis detection in adolescentsJournal of Adolescent Health Care, 1986
- Microbiology of the lower genital tract in postmenarchal adolescent girls: Differences by sexual activity, contraception, and presence of nonspecific vaginitisThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1985
- Chlamydia trachomatis: Important relationships to race, contraception, lower genital tract infection, and Papanicolaou smearThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1984
- Epidemiological and clinical correlates of chlamydial infection of the cervix.Sexually Transmitted Infections, 1981