Medical malpractice claims in obstetrics and gynaecology: comparisons between the United States and Britain
- 1 May 1988
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 95 (5) , 454-461
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb12796.x
Abstract
Obstetricians and gynaecologists have been particularly affected by the increase in the cost and number of medical malpractice claims in Britain. US obstetricians and gynaecologists have experienced a disproportionately higher rate of claim than other practitioners in that country. This article reviews the US experience of obstetrics and gynaecology malpractice claims and questions the validity of showing comparisons between the US and UK. However, even if British malpractice claims do not reach the level of American claims, the effects of claims on the National Health Service, recruitment to obstetrics and gynaecology, and clinical practice are significant.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparisons of National Cesarean-Section RatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The Destabilization of Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- When Perinatal Caregivers Enter the Insurance BusinessBirth, 1986
- Caesarean section dissected, 1978–1983BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1986
- The Spring of HopeObstetrics & Gynecology, 1986
- Cummentary: Litigation in obstetrics and gynaccologyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- Litigation in obstetrics and gynaecologyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- An Analysis of Anesthesia Medical Liability Claims in the United Kingdom, 1977–1982International Anesthesiology Clinics, 1984
- Doctors, Damages and DeterrenceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Medical Malpractice: An Economist's ViewAmerican Bar Foundation Research Journal, 1976